Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01wp988p138
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCohen, Jonathan D
dc.contributor.advisorNorman, Kenneth A
dc.contributor.authorOliveira Beukers, Andre
dc.contributor.otherPsychology Department
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-21T17:22:03Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-21T17:22:03Z-
dc.date.created2023-01-01
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01wp988p138-
dc.description.abstractWe all possess a mental library of schemas that specify how different types of events unfold. Howare these schemas acquired? A key challenge is that learning a new schema can catastrophically interfere with (i.e., overwrite) old knowledge. One solution to this dilemma is to use interleaved training to learn a single representation that accommodates all schemas. However, another class of models posits that catastrophic interference can be avoided by splitting off new representations when large prediction errors occur. A key differentiating prediction is that, according to splitting models, catastrophic interference can be prevented even under blocked training curricula. We conducted a series of semi-naturalistic experiments and simulations with Bayesian and neural network models to compare the predictions made by the “splitting” versus “non-splitting” hypotheses of schema learning. We found better performance in blocked compared to interleaved curricula, and explain these results using a Bayesian model that incorporates representational splitting in response to large prediction errors. In a follow-up experiment, we validated the model prediction that inserting blocked training early in learning leads to better learning performance than inserting blocked training later in the learning process. Our results suggest different learning environments (i.e., curricula) play an important role in shaping schema composition. We discuss the different roles prediction errors have for “carving nature at its joints”.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University
dc.subject.classificationExperimental psychology
dc.titleMechanisms of interference mitigation in human learning and memory
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)
pu.date.classyear2023
pu.departmentPsychology
Appears in Collections:Psychology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OliveiraBeukers_princeton_0181D_14669.pdf3.09 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.