Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01tx31qm82r
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorRogerson, Richard
dc.contributor.authorSorg-Langhans, George Leopold
dc.contributor.otherEconomics Department
dc.date.accessioned2021-10-04T13:48:34Z-
dc.date.available2021-10-04T13:48:34Z-
dc.date.created2021-01-01
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01tx31qm82r-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation consists of three independent chapters on questions surrounding household dynamics and machine learning methods developed to address them. In the first chapter, which is co-authored with Jesus Fernandez-Villaverde, Galo Nuno, and Maximilian Vogler, we develop a deep-learning algorithm to globally solve high-dimensional dynamic programming problems that arise in macroeconomic models. This approach allows us to address household dynamics in a rich environment driven by both aggregate and idiosyncratic uncertainty. We evaluate our methodology in a standard neoclassical growth model and then demonstrate its power in two high-dimensional applications -- a model of dynamic capital allocation and a model of migration and labor mobility. In the second chapter I propose a new machine learning approach to understanding consumption insurance of households, a central issue in the context of household dynamics. I draw on a state-of-the-art machine learning method, gradient boosted trees, to predict consumption in the Panel Study of Income Dynamics. With the resulting panel data set in hand, I adopt Blundell, Pistaferri, and Preston's (2008) assumptions about the underlying permanent-transitory income process, which allows me to estimate insurance coefficients. Importantly, I find qualitative and quantitative differences to their insurance predictions. In the third chapter, which is co-authored with Riccardo Cioffi, and Maximilian Vogler, we investigate how different theories of wealth inequality interact with important policy experiments. To this end, we calibrate four models, each incorporating a different inequality-generating channel emphasized in the theoretical literature, and compare their predictions regarding different policy experiments. We find stark quantitative and qualitative differences in predictions across channels for a given policy experiment, indicating that analyzing their relative importance is crucial to our understanding of wealth inequality.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu>catalog.princeton.edu</a>
dc.subjectConsumption Insurance
dc.subjectEconomics
dc.subjectHousehold Dynamics
dc.subjectMachine Learning
dc.subject.classificationEconomics
dc.titleEssays on Machine Learning Methods and Household Dynamics
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)
pu.date.classyear2021
pu.departmentEconomics
Appears in Collections:Economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
SorgLanghans_princeton_0181D_13824.pdf3.28 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.