Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01s7526f88k
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributorDasgupta, Shamik-
dc.contributor.advisorSmith, Michael-
dc.contributor.authorSims, Lauren-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-20T12:56:33Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-20T12:56:33Z-
dc.date.created2016-04-04-
dc.date.issued2016-07-20-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01s7526f88k-
dc.description.abstractWhat does empirical, psychological research on situated rationality mean for contemporary theories of self-knowledge and moral responsibility in philosophy? In this paper, I consider four cases of non-deliberative thought and action — stereotype threat, implicit bias, unreflective voting decisions, and manipulative advertising practices that lead to harm. Extending Victoria McGeer’s points in The Moral Development of First-Person Authority, I clarify how supporting democratic policies that mitigate unwanted effects of these judgments can develop our own self-knowledge and capacity for individual responsibility.en_US
dc.format.extent41 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleMcGeer and Hurley on Self-Knowledge and Responsibilityen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentPhilosophyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2023

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Sims._LJ_SeniorThesis.pdf2.13 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.