Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ns064865h
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSinclair, Stacey A.-
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Ashleigh-
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-19T15:06:50Z-
dc.date.available2017-07-19T15:06:50Z-
dc.date.created2017-04-12-
dc.date.issued2017-4-12-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ns064865h-
dc.description.abstractThe present study assessed the degree to which a collective benefit diversity frame influences the perception of the role of diversity within institutions of higher education, in the presence of affirmative action policies. White participants completed a single category implicit association test, after reading two mission statements, each corresponding either a collective benefit frame or a restorative justice frame of diversity. White and racial/ethnic minority participants rated the degree to which they perceived a collective merit or restorative justice frame to be endorsed by their university, and then completed a series of measures to understand the role of diversity. Our findings revealed that both racial/ethnic minority and majority participants reported negative health outcomes in a collective benefit frame.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleAre You Using Me for My Diversity? Consequences of Collective Merit and Restorative Justice Diversity Frames in Higher Educationen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2017en_US
pu.departmentPsychologyen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid960762549-
pu.contributor.advisorid960292411-
Appears in Collections:Psychology, 1930-2023

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Johnson_Ashleigh.pdf609.38 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.