Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j098zb26x
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHong, Harrisonen_US
dc.contributor.authorYan, Philipen_US
dc.contributor.otherEconomics Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-06-05T19:46:36Z-
dc.date.available2014-06-05T19:46:36Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01j098zb26x-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is a collection of three essays on the effects of short-sales and leverage constraints on market efficiency. The first two essays are single-authored, while the third essay is coauthored with Harrison Hong and Jose Scheinkman. The first essay investigates what drives momentum crashes. I argue that momentum crashes are due to crowded trades which push prices away from fundamentals leading to strong reversals, and exacerbated by limits of arbitrage due to impediments to short selling. I show that momentum crashes can be avoided in the cross section by shorting only non-crowded losers. There is considerably more short-covering during times when momentum fails. I show using high frequency transactions data that short covering is especially severe in the crowded loser portfolio. A placebo test using a set of 63 futures contracts show that momentum crashes do not exist in futures market after market exposure is correctly hedged, which is consistent with my hypothesis. The second essay studies the market impact of margin changes in the metals commodity futures market. Using CFTC's proprietary transactional audit trail with detailed account information, I document substantial changes in the composition of traders when a margin change is imposed. Regardless of the direction of margin change, market participants decrease their market exposure after controlling for volatility. Moreover, the effect of margin changes depends on the fraction of traders who are levered, and thus cannot be assessed with public data. The third essay shows that the short ratio is strongly correlated with a stock's share turnover or liquidity. So highly shorted stocks may simply be easier for arbitrageurs to cover their shorts and hence to arbitrage. We show that days-to-cover, which divides short ratio by turnover, is a superior measure of binding short-sales constraints --- stocks with high days-to-cover under-perform the market by 140 basis points per month. And this under-performance has increased significantly over time as the correlation between short ratio and share turnover has gotten more pronounced.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectCrowded Tradesen_US
dc.subjectDays-to-Coveren_US
dc.subjectMarginen_US
dc.subjectMomentumen_US
dc.subjectMomentum Crashesen_US
dc.subjectShort-sales constrainten_US
dc.subject.classificationFinanceen_US
dc.titleTHE EFFECTS OF SHORT-SALES AND LEVERAGE CONSTRAINTS ON MARKET EFFICIENCYen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Economics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Yan_princeton_0181D_10916.pdf1.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.