Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01f7623c62x
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorChappell, Richarden_US
dc.contributor.otherPhilosophy Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-15T23:57:29Z-
dc.date.available2014-11-15T06:00:31Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01f7623c62x-
dc.description.abstractAccording to the Fitting Attitudes analysis of value, we can understand <italic>value</italic> in terms of <italic>desirability</italic> or what it is fitting to desire. But we can also raise normative questions about the fittingness of (e.g.) beliefs, emotions, and choices. My dissertation explores the broader significance of such 'fittingness' evaluations from a consequentialist standpoint. This project has both a normative and a metaethical component. The norma tive component develops and assesses the consequentialist's conception of a morally fitting (or virtuous) agent, thereby responding to several traditional character-based objections to the view. Critics have alleged, for example, that a consequentialist agent would see people as mere value receptacles, be cold and calculating, untrustworthy, and disturbingly 'alienated' from themselves and others. I rebut these charges. The metaethical component of my project explores how attention to the possible types of 'fittingness' evaluations can help us to define the scope and limits of normative theorizing, with important implications for how we should formulate consequentialism. In particular, I argue that even if we think that what's right is <italic>determined by</italic> the value facts, we should not go so far as to think that rightness is conceptually <italic>reducible</italic> to goodness.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectCharacteren_US
dc.subjectConsequentialismen_US
dc.subjectEthicsen_US
dc.subjectFitting Attitudesen_US
dc.subjectMetaethicsen_US
dc.subjectVirtueen_US
dc.subject.classificationPhilosophyen_US
dc.subject.classificationEthicsen_US
dc.titleFitting Consequentialismen_US