Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01wp988n121
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDaCosta Kaufmann, Thomasen_US
dc.contributor.advisorYerkes, Carolynen_US
dc.contributor.authorPetcu, Elizabeth Juliaen_US
dc.contributor.otherArt and Archaeology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-23T19:38:21Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-23T09:08:53Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01wp988n121-
dc.description.abstractThe interplay between architecture and the other visual arts in the work and era of Strasbourg artist Wendel Dietterlin the Elder (c. 1550-1599) is the subject of this dissertation. New links between architecture and figural arts such as painting and sculpture emerged in sixteenth-century northern Europe along with the revival of classical culture, the Reformation, and the advent of the printed, illustrated art treatise, sparking volatile debates about the nature of architectural expertise. Scholars have conventionally probed these issues by examining the era’s theoretical literature or the dual careers of painter-architects, leaving period notions of the formal intersections between art and architecture largely obscure. Examining the formal and theoretical aspects of a wider variety of primary sources, this project scrutinizes how Dietterlin’s little-known oeuvre transformed the culture of ornament that defined the relationships between architectural and artistic expertise for early modern northern Europe. Dietterlin’s Architectura treatise—published over three installments in 1593, 1594, and finally in 1598 as an expanded compilation of the previous releases—provides the study’s evidential centerpiece. Drawing on authors such as Vitruvius, Dürer, and Vasari, the sparse text and copious etchings of Dietterlin’s Architectura develop an innovative theory of the five canonical Orders of architecture as manners of ornament that can inspire decorative inventions in any medium. This study contextualizes the treatise’s extensive influence on art literature and ornament design to argue that Dietterlin’s precocious, universal theory of ornamental style occasioned a broad re-negotiation of architectural knowledge. With reference to its first comprehensive catalogue of Dietterlin drawings, the dissertation reconstructs the Architectura’s formation, showing how Dietterlin refined and popularized the idea that ornament design in architecture and in art follow distinct technical rules but obey common protocols of style. It also analyzes how the treatise’s experiments with architectural figuration and its cosmos of classical and Christian symbolism melded the rhetoric of architecture and the figural arts, and inspired new discourses on intermediality, the paragone, and the synthesis of the arts. The dissertation demonstrates that Dietterlin revised the Vitruvian ideal of the artistically savvy architect, making architectural expertise likewise indispensible to the formation of the well-rounded artist.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectArchitecturaen_US
dc.subjectArchitectureen_US
dc.subjectDietterlinen_US
dc.subjectearly modernen_US
dc.subjectparagoneen_US
dc.subjectRenaissanceen_US
dc.subject.classificationArt historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationEuropean historyen_US
dc.titleOrders of Elaboration: Wendel Dietterlin and the Architecturaen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2019-06-23en_US
Appears in Collections:Art and Archaeology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Petcu_princeton_0181D_11351.pdf46.5 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.