Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vh53wz70g
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHanioğlu, Mehmed Şükrü-
dc.contributor.authorRadovanovic, Jelena-
dc.contributor.otherNear Eastern Studies Department-
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-10T15:21:59Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-08T12:00:06Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vh53wz70g-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the incorporation of the Niš sancak into the Serbian nation-state after its annexation by Serbia from the Ottoman Empire in 1878. It analyzes several distinct but connected processes, which together comprised this transition: the region’s administrative integration, demographic transformation, and changes in property ownership. I examine how the displacement of Muslim property owners and the establishment of a temporary, special legal system in the annexed region in order to facilitate its incorporation into Serbia contributed to property redistribution in the nation-state. In contrast to the prevailing scholarship that attributes nineteenth-century political turmoil in the Balkans primarily to the birth of nationalism, I argue that property disputes played a central role in the political transformations of the region in this period. I demonstrate that these disputes, which had challenged the legitimacy of the Ottoman Empire, continued to pose a challenge to the nation-state, albeit under different circumstances. This work traces how Serbia implemented its property laws, which were based on Western models, in an annexed territory where property had previously been regulated by a complex overlap of Islamic law, the Ottoman Land Code, local regulations, and custom. I focus in particular on the types of property, such as vakıf in the city and çiftlik in the hinterland, that did not have exact counterparts in the European/Roman legal tradition which Serbia chose to embrace. I argue that Serbian legislators’ ability to frame these forms of property as non-European and non-modern enabled the state to interpret them in ways that led to their dissolution and appropriation by the new nation-state. I locate my case-study on a wider map of competing claims on Ottoman property, discourses of civilization and modernization, international diplomacy, and state-building in the Balkans.-
dc.language.isoen-
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University-
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> catalog.princeton.edu </a>-
dc.subjectciftlik-
dc.subjectnation-state-
dc.subjectOttoman Balkans-
dc.subjectproperty-
dc.subjectSerbia-
dc.subjectwaqf-
dc.subject.classificationNear Eastern studies-
dc.subject.classificationMiddle Eastern history-
dc.subject.classificationEast European studies-
dc.titleContested Legacy: Property in Transition to Nation-State in Post-Ottoman Niš-
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)-
pu.embargo.terms2022-04-08-
Appears in Collections:Near Eastern Studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Radovanovic_princeton_0181D_13283.pdf1.79 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.