Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01td96k474s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGuenther, Katjaen_US
dc.contributor.authorClark, Hannah-Louiseen_US
dc.contributor.otherHistory of Science Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-25T22:41:00Z-
dc.date.available2016-09-25T05:08:43Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01td96k474s-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines the professional and personal predicaments experienced by twentieth-century Algerian <italic>auxiliaires médicaux<italic> and <italic>adjoints techniques de la Santé publique<italic>. Both cadres comprised Muslim men who were recruited by the French colonial state to provide a limited form of Republican welfare in the Algerian countryside (the <italic>bled<italic>). Departing from doctor-centred histories, I interrogate official narratives to uncover how state medicine and hygiene functioned on the ground. Drawing upon national and regional archives in Algeria and France, Islamic legal treatises, newspapers, and non-official sources such as private letters and memoirs, genealogical websites and blogs, and oral histories to reconstruct the history of the medical auxiliarat, I explore three different aspects of state medicine and public health in Algeria. First, I demonstrate that local knowledge, Islamic discursive traditions, and pre-colonial forms of benevolence and community welfare continued to operate within Algerian public health, even under French colonial occupation and rule. Second, I disarticulate the conflicts and points of convergence between and among Muslim healthworkers, European doctors and administrators, and local populations. Finally, I adduce the place of medicine and health within technologies of colonial administration, including how the actions of the low-ranking medical auxiliary shaped these technologies. The history of medical auxiliaries forces a re-examination of debates about the colonial state, medicine, and rural agency and the dichotomised representation of Algerian society as comprising two opposed population blocs of coloniser and colonised. Through new archival discoveries, and through reading French sources in the light of Arabic sources (and vice versa), the dissertation illustrates that state medicine was not only a tool of colonial elites but also a resource that held considerable appeal for both educated and unlettered Muslims and settlers. The work of medical auxiliaries expanded the powers of the state to manage human populations and disease, and simultaneously engaged the rural populace in the idea of state medical relief. This approach opens up a new direction in the empirical study of indigenous medical actors in empire and breaks new ground for a social history of colonialism in Algeria.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectAlgeriaen_US
dc.subjectColonialismen_US
dc.subjectIslamen_US
dc.subjectMedicineen_US
dc.subjectRaceen_US
dc.subjectRural Historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationHistory of scienceen_US
dc.subject.classificationNorth African studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationModern historyen_US
dc.titleDoctoring the 'Bled': Medical Auxiliaries and the Administration of Rural Life in Colonial Algeria, 1904-1954en_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2016-09-25en_US
Appears in Collections:History of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Clark_princeton_0181D_11121.pdf49.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.