Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorPerry, Seth
dc.contributor.authorBaysa, Michael
dc.contributor.otherReligion Department
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation explores how Anglo-Protestant authority was crystalized through the publishing process in colonial and early British-America. It engages with book history, media studies, literary studies, religious studies, and American religious history to illustrate how contingency, as a framework, could reveal how Protestant power operated where and when itmay have been deemed weak or absent. In five chapters, I examine both constraints on religious printing beyond censorship and opportunities to reach audiences through manuscript publication. The stories of eighteenth-century manuscripts and their authors who aspired to publish demonstrates the limits of the public sphere framework to describe print as media for dialogue. It was too embedded in Anglo-Protestant logics that imagined Anglo-Protestant readership for published translations, discouraged non-English religious publications through mechanical limits on the printing press, and sustained the mediatory capacity of ministers to speak to and on behalf of a religious public. Far from being an accessible platform, print publishing preserved the Anglo-Protestantism character of public religion at a period when ministers’ political influence waned and print was the ascendant medium for public discourse. Given print’s constraints, writers continued to rely on manuscripts to reach a broader audience. Manuscript circulation and scribal publication were not only comparable alternatives to the highly curated publishing process, but survived as a practice into eighteenth-century because of how well it facilitated conversation among communities that publishers never served. Whatever exceptional texts or literary firsts occurred in print paled in comparison to the religious pluralism that thrived through manuscripts. More importantly, this dissertation encourages more dynamic readings of manuscript and print mediums to better understand the complex worlds that they not only generated, but also were made and unmade to inhabit.
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University
dc.subjectEarly America
dc.subjectHistory of the Book
dc.subjectPrinting Press
dc.subjectPublic Sphere
dc.subjectReligious Studies
dc.subject.classificationReligious history
dc.titleUnpublishing Religion: How Anglo-Protestant Printing Constrained Public Speech in Early America
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)
Appears in Collections:Religion

Files in This Item:
This content is embargoed until 2025-06-14. For questions about theses and dissertations, please contact the Mudd Manuscript Library. For questions about research datasets, as well as other inquiries, please contact the DataSpace curators.

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.