Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01m326m3943
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCohen, Mark Ren_US
dc.contributor.authorZinger, Odeden_US
dc.contributor.otherNear Eastern Studies Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2014-09-25T22:39:14Z-
dc.date.available2014-09-25T22:39:14Z-
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01m326m3943-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation examines how Jews in medieval Egypt negotiated marital disputes while maneuvering between individual desires, legal prescriptions and societal expectations. The main sources for this investigation are the documents of the Cairo Geniza, a rich cache of manuscripts discovered in the Ben Ezra synagogue in Old Cairo. The study of medieval Jewish communities is often dominated by a top-down approach that focuses on the elites and adopts the perspective of the communal leadership as it examines the ʻJewish communityʼ as the fundamental manifestation of Jewish life. The present study complements this perspective by offering a ʻview from belowʼ of married life and communal institutions. Recovering the life-stories of non-elite individuals as they experience communal institutions and creatively negotiate the legal arena reveals a substantially different image of Jewish communal life. For example, I show how women experienced the legal arena differently than their husbands as communal officials tended to pressure women to compromise their monetary rights. This, in turn, led women to adopt certain characteristic practices and behaviors in their interactions with communal leaders so as to withstand these pressures. In this way, rather than seeing communal legal institutions as merely imposing religious law on deviant practice, I shift the focus to the litigantsʼ point of view as "consumers" of legal resources whose navigation of the pluralistic legal arena depended on status and personal networks as much as on legal considerations. Gender and status are revealed to be crucial categories in our understanding of Geniza society and medieval patriarchy. The result of this analysis is a better understanding of the instability and flexibility of married life and of their implications for the pursuing of legal disputes in medieval Egypt. The study is accompanied by an edition of nineteen previously unpublished Geniza documents that demonstrate the various aspects of married life examined in the study.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectCourtsen_US
dc.subjectDivorceen_US
dc.subjectGenderen_US
dc.subjectGenizaen_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectMarriageen_US
dc.subject.classificationMiddle Eastern historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationJudaic studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationGender studiesen_US
dc.titleWomen, Gender and Law: Marital Disputes According to Documents of the Cairo Genizaen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Near Eastern Studies

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Zinger_princeton_0181D_11053.pdf4.52 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.