Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01b27740075
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorGhamari-Tabrizi, Behrooz
dc.contributor.authorRashidbeigi, Samin
dc.contributor.otherNear Eastern Studies Department
dc.date.accessioned2024-07-24T16:33:02Z-
dc.date.created2024-01-01
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01b27740075-
dc.description.abstractIn this dissertation, I explore the emergence of blood transfusion technology in modern Iran. I examine how blood transfusion mediated the linkages between the very intimate and personal and the very public and collective. In doing so, I revisit the ways in which individuals in Iranian society related to the national collective in twentieth century. Drawing on archival research and oral history interviews conducted in Iran, I argue that the conviction that donating blood is a virtue, if not a duty, emerged out of several entangled historical processes that transformed Iranians from subjects governed by the sovereign to self-governed citizens with bodily autonomy. I explain that transfusion technology and science evoked pre-existing medical, religious, and political discourses about blood, and merged them with the ideas of kinship, intimacy, citizenship, and altruism in post-WWII Iran. With this argument and the sub-arguments derived from it, I contribute to two bodies of literature. First, I am in conversation with the contributions of those historians of medicine who took the physical human body as a contextual and contested category, with special attention to those who focused on blood transfusion. Through exploring the history of blood donation and transfusion in Iran, I explain the historical and discursive processes that configured voluntary blood donation as a virtue, thereby destabilizing the seemingly obvious link between blood donation and altruism. Second, by highlighting the concrete materiality of the individual and institutional relations that transfusions generate, I add a new layer of complexity to the long-lasting debates about citizenship, subject-formation, nation-building, and state authority in the historiography of modern Iran. This dissertation conceptualizes transfusable blood, a source of meaning and information, as a medium through which ordinary Iranians created their own concepts of selfhood, the other, and citizenship.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University
dc.subject20th century
dc.subjectAltruism
dc.subjectblood transfusion
dc.subjectHistory of medicine
dc.subjectIran
dc.subjectthe body
dc.subject.classificationMiddle Eastern history
dc.subject.classificationScience history
dc.titleCONVICTIONS AND PERSUASIONS: TRANSFUSION TECHNOLOGY AND THE BLOOD DONOR IN MODERN IRAN
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)
pu.embargo.lift2026-06-06-
pu.embargo.terms2026-06-06
pu.date.classyear2024
pu.departmentNear Eastern Studies
Appears in Collections:Near Eastern Studies

Files in This Item:
This content is embargoed until 2026-06-06. For questions about theses and dissertations, please contact the Mudd Manuscript Library. For questions about research datasets, as well as other inquiries, please contact the DataSpace curators.


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.