Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019880vt70q
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorSviatschi, Maria Micaela-
dc.contributor.authorFalck, Kiersten-
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-02T19:57:13Z-
dc.date.available2018-08-02T19:57:13Z-
dc.date.created2018-04-09-
dc.date.issued2018-08-02-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019880vt70q-
dc.description.abstractWhen did all crime become attached with a label reading “one size fits all”? Literature shows that noncognitive skill education effectively reduces crime rates, or at least pushes them in the right direction. Thus, this research suggests that to reduce crime, policy should focus on increasing noncognitive skill education. But what if all crime is not the same? In this paper, we set out to find whether every crime is the same or should be treated as the same in the context of noncognitive skills. We access data from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1997 and model outcomes through OLS and Household Fixed Effects regressions. Our results show that while individual characteristics play a small role, family effects may make the most impact on the association between noncognitive skills and types of crime.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleNot All Crime Is Created Equal: Noncognitive Analyses of Criminal Behavioren_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2018en_US
pu.departmentEconomicsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid960953675-
Appears in Collections:Economics, 1927-2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
FALCK-KIERSTEN-THESIS.pdf527.6 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.