Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp017w62f824j
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorConterno, Maria-
dc.date.accessioned2012-04-17T15:23:10Z-
dc.date.available2012-04-17T15:23:10Z-
dc.date.issued2012-04-17-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp017w62f824j-
dc.description.abstractThe seventh and eighth centuries have been called the “Dark Age” of Byzantium because of the paucity of historical sources that illuminate them. This lack is commonly ascribed more to scant production than to failed transmission. Traditional historiographical genres in Greek did actually fall silent for two centuries, but historiography in the wide sense of “memory-keeping” (as well as “memory-building”) found other ways of expression. Theophanes’ Chronographia, Agapius of Mabbug’s and Michael the Syrian’s chronicles and The Chronicle of the Year 1234 share a significant amount of historical information, undoubtedly drawn from the same sources, via different paths. Close examination of this material leads to a better understanding of how forms of Greek historiography survived outside the capital of the empire and the ways in which information and texts flowed across geographic, linguistic and ethnic boundaries in a period that has otherwise been considered as culturally stagnant.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSyriac Historiographyen_US
dc.subjectByzantine Historiographyen_US
dc.subjectIntercultural Transmissionen_US
dc.titleStriking a Match on Byzantium’s “Dark Age”en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber350-2103en_US
Appears in Collections:Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
Striking a match on Byzantiums Dark Age.pdf172.23 kBAdobe PDF