Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015d86p341p
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYap, Luther-
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-09T14:38:30Z-
dc.date.available2022-08-09T14:38:30Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp015d86p341p-
dc.description.abstractThis paper proposes a method in an environment with heterogeneous treatment effects to bound policy relevant treatment parameters (PRTP) without the monotonicity assumption that the instrumental variable works in the same direction for all individuals. While the procedure applies to all PRTP objects, this paper provides a detailed analysis for local average treatment effects in counterfactual environments (LATE*) that does not yet have a procedure for sensitivity analysis to monotonicity violations. The bounding framework uses the proportion of defiers relative to compliers as a sensitivity parameter and yields an identified set that is an interval. The bounds are sharp for binary outcomes. The method is illustrated in an example where the same sex instrument is used to find the effect of having a third child on labor force participation. I find that bounds are informative only for small violations in monotonicity.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries655-
dc.subjectinstrumental variablesen_US
dc.subjecttreatment effectsen_US
dc.subjectlocal average treatment effecten_US
dc.subjectLATEen_US
dc.subjectpolicy relevant treatment parametersen_US
dc.subjectpartial identificationen_US
dc.subjectmonotonicityen_US
dc.subjectsensitivity analysisen_US
dc.titleSensitivity of Policy Relevant Treatment Parameters to Violations of Monotonicityen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
655.pdf584.4 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.