Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014q77fr47j
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHomonoff, Tatiana-
dc.date.accessioned2013-09-16T18:23:27Z-
dc.date.available2013-09-16T18:23:27Z-
dc.date.issued2013-03-27-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014q77fr47j-
dc.description.abstractFinancial incentives are an important policy tool for encouraging prosocial behavior. However, evidence on the effect of very small financial incentives is mixed. Drawing on an original data set, I investigate the effect of a five-cent shopping bag tax imposed in the Washington Metropolitan Area. Despite the small size of the incentive, I find that the tax decreased the fraction of customers using a disposable bag by a substantial amount. In contrast, a similar policy that offered customers a five-cent bonus for reusable bag use generated virtually no effect on behavior. This pattern is consistent with a model of loss aversion and underscores the importance of the form a financial incentive takes - a tax versus a bonus - when designing policies aimed at shaping consumer behavior.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 575-
dc.titleCan Small Incentives Have Large Effects? The Impact of Taxes versus Bonuses on Disposable Bag Useen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber3602050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
575.pdf669.6 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.