Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0108612n549
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSiow, Aloysiusen_US
dc.contributor.authorAltonji, Joseph G.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:58:02Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:58:02Z-
dc.date.issued1985-04-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.citationQuarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 102, no.2, May 1987en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp0108612n549-
dc.description.abstractThis paper tests the rational expectations lifecycle model of consumption against (i) a simple Keynesian model and (ii) the rational expectations lifecycle model with imperfect capital markets. The tests are based upon the relative responsiveness of consumption to income changes which can be predicted from past information and income changes which cannot be predicted. Problems caused by measurement error in the income changes are circumvented by using the innovations from a vector autoregression of the measures of the determinants of income to form a noisy instrument for the unanticipated change in incomﬁ and using the lagged values of the measures of the income determinants to form an instrument for the anticipated income change. We show that the Keynesian model implies that the regression coefficients relating the change in consumption to the instruments for the anticipated and unanticipated components of the income change should be equal. The lifecycle model (with perfect capital markets) implies that only the instrument for the unanticipated component should affect consumption. The empirical results support the lifecycle model. In addition, we incorporate capital market imperfections into our empirical formulation of the lifecycle model by assuming that the marginal interest rate at a point in time is a differentiable, concave function of net assets. This leads to a test for capital market imperfections based upon whether consumption responds differently to positive and negative predictable changes in income. Our results are inconclusive.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 186en_US
dc.subjectmeasurement erroren_US
dc.subjectpermanent income hypothesisen_US
dc.subjectliquidity constraintsen_US
dc.subjectconsumptionen_US
dc.titleTesting the Response of Consumption to Income Changesen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat