Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Art/Work: The Systems-Oriented Artist Expert, 1968–1984|
|Authors:||Handwerker, Margo Kelly|
|Publisher:||Princeton, NJ : Princeton University|
|Abstract:||Art/Work: The Systems-Oriented Artist Expert, 1968–1984 examines the pivotal but neglected Systems art movement and its impact on contemporary social practice. Systems artists were responding in particular to the emerging modern environmental movement of the late 1960s and early 1970s. Their ecological thinking, inspired by cybernetics, referred both to their environmental activism and to the importance of regulation for governing systems, including a “maintenance” art system informed by ritual studies. These artists’ ability to make their art nearly indistinguishable from the systems that they sought to interrogate established a mode of expertise that “social practice” artists would later inherit. However, as social practice gained momentum in the mid-1980s with the rise of neoliberalism, it brought with it from Systems art a murky conflation of the activist-artists’ expertise and their capacity to deliver service, the consequences of which we see now in contemporary art criticism, arts funding, and art making. Absent an account of Systems art’s role in the development of contemporary social practice with regard to regulation in particular, the latter movement tends to overemphasize correcting and solving social problems. By examining Systems art, we discover not only how this “ethical turn” in social practice emerged, but also how to reframe the social practice movement, moving away from its emphasis on deliverables and, instead, toward a particular kind of artistic expertise. The emphasis within Systems art was not on creating a more holistic artist who has expertise in multiple fields; rather, it was on being an artist who functions, as an expert, within a whole system of other fields of expertise that might work together. The Systems artists’ transdisciplinary methods, which appear to embrace de-specialization, actually reinforce the emphasis on part-to-whole relationships so characteristic of the cybernetic era—the same quality that was also influencing the artists’ ecological subjects. In light of this history, the “ethical turn” within social practice is not a flaw, but rather points to the significance of systems of governance that are shared and renegotiated over time.|
|Alternate format:||The Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: catalog.princeton.edu|
|Type of Material:||Academic dissertations (Ph.D.)|
|Appears in Collections:||Architecture|
Files in This Item:
This content is embargoed until 2021-01-30. For more information contact the Mudd Manuscript Library.
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.