Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01x059c9648
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorAchen, Christopher Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Matthew Stephenen_US
dc.contributor.otherPolitics Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-06-22T19:26:21Z-
dc.date.available2015-06-22T19:26:21Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01x059c9648-
dc.description.abstractDespite a rich history of research on urban and local politics, we know relatively little about the level of responsiveness of local governments to the preferences of their citizens. This dissertation examines the relationship between policy outcomes in local governments and the views of citizens, focusing on towns in New York State. In New York, over 200 towns passed laws or resolutions addressing hydraulic fracturing ("fracking"), a controversial method of oil and gas extraction. I find that responsiveness is more nuanced than presented in the literature; local policies toward hydrofracking tend to reflect the opinions of citizens. Analyses begin with an assessment of public knowledge of and support for hydraulic fracturing. Examining determinants of public support for hydrofracking, I find that partisanship and ideology are the strongest predictors of support, more so than demographics or geographical proximity. Using the findings from this analysis, I construct a measure of each town's level of support for hydrofracking, a key input to be compared to policy outputs. I then assess the dynamics of the policymaking process within two towns, as public and private interests compete to influence policy outcomes. Through an analysis of qualitative data, I find that politicians in two Southern Tier New York towns adopt the policy preferred by the larger and more organized citizen group within the town. However, I also find that one pro-fracking county government, by virtue of its more powerful position relative to towns, dissuaded an anti-fracking town from instituting a moratorium on fracking. Building off the case studies, I examine the responsiveness of hydrofracking policies to mass opinion in all towns that could potentially face natural gas drilling in New York. Controlling for other factors, I find that towns with residents more opposed to natural gas drilling are more likely to prohibit fracking. Furthermore, I find that county governments influence the policymaking process through their position on the issue; towns in anti-fracking counties are more likely to adopt anti-fracking policies. The dissertation concludes with a discussion of responsiveness in local governments, as well as the policy implications of local actions toward hydraulic fracturing.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectEnvironmental Policyen_US
dc.subjectHydraulic Fracturingen_US
dc.subjectLocal governmenten_US
dc.subjectLocal politicsen_US
dc.subjectPublic Opinion and Institutionsen_US
dc.subjectResponsivenessen_US
dc.subject.classificationPolitical Scienceen_US
dc.subject.classificationPublic policyen_US
dc.titleResponsiveness and Policy Choice in Local Governments: The Case of Municipal Policies Toward Hydraulic Fracturingen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Politics

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Barnes_princeton_0181D_11262.pdf4.46 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.