Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBrodsky, Claudiaen_US
dc.contributor.advisorAlliston, Aprilen_US
dc.contributor.authorLaBrada, Eloy Francisco Rodriguezen_US
dc.contributor.otherComparative Literature Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractThe pre-revolutionary period in Europe is often called the age of enlightenment and experiment: an epoch marked by Bacon's scientific "experimentum," Locke and Hume's experiential empiricism, and Diderot's experimental fiction (to name but a few). But "expérience," both "experiment" and "experience" in French, could refer to experimentations of all kinds, spanning from the scientific to the sexual, and thus raised serious concerns about what kinds of experiments ought to be undertaken and by whom. Which experiences are socially acceptable, and which are not? Who has the right to experiment/experience? When it comes to the education of "young women" in early modern France, it will not be experience but inexperience --a "lack of experience"-- that becomes a regulatory ideal espoused in many old regime didactic treatises and educational tracts. In what ways is experience regulated by gender norms circumscribing who qualifies as a subject of experience, who can and cannot have experience, as well as what does and does not count as experience? How is experience distinguished from inexperience, and when do such distinctions founder? This philosophical inquiry follows the trope of "inexperience" from its appearance in select writings of early modern France to its contemporary legacies, exploring how discourses of experience/experiment will have always been inextricable from the question of gender norms. After touching upon theories of experience in the history of western philosophy (Chapter 1), this work then moves to certain early modern texts -- by Crenne (Chapter 2), Du Plaisir (Chapter 3), Ducos (Chapter 4), and others-- which theorize amorous experience in terms of its unlivedness and by the ways in which it cannot be experienced in presence or in person. Subverting the distinction between experience and its inexperience, these theories of unlived love suggest that experience, most especially amorous experience, is ultimately impossible to delimit and define. A closing coda, engaging with these early modern texts philosophically and reading them in terms of the history of philosophy, contends that these theories of unlived love prefigure the interrogation of self-present experience credited to Nietzsche, Wittgenstein, Derrida, and others, by laying siege to the metaphysical presuppositions that have long structured conceits of "experience," from the Cartesian "Cogito" to Husserl's transcendental "Ego."en_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectContinental Philosophyen_US
dc.subjectEarly Modern Philosophyen_US
dc.subjectHistory of Philosophyen_US
dc.subjectQueer Theoryen_US
dc.subject.classificationGender studiesen_US
dc.subject.classificationGLBT studiesen_US
dc.titleThe Age of Inexperience: Theories of Unlived Love in Early Modern Franceen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
Appears in Collections:Comparative Literature

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
LaBrada_princeton_0181D_10983.pdf3.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Download

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.