Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01tb09j8619
Title: Procedural Rules and Decision-Making Paradoxes
Authors: Iuliano, Jason
Advisors: Whittington, Keith
Contributors: Politics Department
Keywords: Evidence
Group Decision Making
Subjects: Law
Philosophy
Political science
Issue Date: 2020
Publisher: Princeton, NJ : Princeton University
Abstract: This dissertation explores three areas of law where voting procedures have unexpected and unintuitive results. Chapter one explores how jury vote-aggregation procedures can lead to outcomes with which no juror agrees. Chapter two highlights how recent Title IX voting reforms designed to benefit sexual assault victims may have the opposite effect. Finally, chapter three examines corporate voting rules and shows how certain procedures can lead corporations to adopt beliefs and take actions that all of its members disavow.
URI: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01tb09j8619
Alternate format: The Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: catalog.princeton.edu
Type of Material: Academic dissertations (Ph.D.)
Language: en
Appears in Collections:Politics

Files in This Item:
This content is embargoed until 2022-02-05. For more information contact the Mudd Manuscript Library.


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.