Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorBabby, Leonard Hen_US
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Cori L.en_US
dc.contributor.otherSlavic Languages and Literatures Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation investigates the overlap of morphological case marking and event structure in Russian and Lithuanian, as well as highlighting issues in the traditional distinctions of structural and non-structural case. I follow Babby (1994) in distinguishing between two kinds of non-structural cases. Lexical case is licensed by particular lexical items, and is unpredictable on the basis of thematic role or semantic function. Semantic case is both linked to thematic role and semantic interpretation. I adopt an event structural analysis of argument structure, following Ramchand 2008's framework. She proposes that argument structure relations are represented in the syntax, in an expanded vP which is composed of functional heads that correspond to the subevents denoted by a predicate: initiation, process and result. Thus, argument structure is based on the structural relationships of arguments and these subevents. I examine two specific instances of non-canonical case marking in Lithuanian and Russian, with the goal of accounting for the case marking facts through an event structural analysis. The first is the phenomenon of oblique passivization. Contrary to claims in the literature (Freidin 1992, Woolford 2006), both Russian and Lithuanian allow passivization by verbs that require a case other than accusative on the internal argument. However, passive participles from oblique case verbs do differ significantly from those formed from accusative case verbs: the former do not allow for the statal, adjectival function of the passive. I argue that this is due to the fact that verbs that license oblique case on their internal arguments are always atelic (following Richardson 2007), which entails the absence of a result state. This results in a difference in syntactic structure between accusative and non-accusative case marking verbs, and accounts for the differences in the functions of passive participles. The second case marking phenomenon is accusative-instrumental case alternations, allowed by certain semantic classes of verbs in Russian and Lithuanian. In this alternation, the accusative is regularly used to indicate that the internal argument rates highly on the Proto Patient scale (in the sense of Dowty 1991). The instrumental case is used to indicate that the internal argument is interpreted as a means. I propose an event structural analysis of these alternations, arguing that the accusative is used when the internal argument occupies the structural position of an undergoer, highlighting that this argument is undergoing some change of location or state during the action described by the verb. Instrumental arguments are paths, arguments that modify the predicate, but do not undergo change themselves. These two phenomena also provide evidence for a structural difference between lexical and semantic case. Under my analysis, lexical case can be licensed in the same position as structural case, while semantic case cannot.en_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectBaltic linguisticsen_US
dc.subjectCase theoryen_US
dc.subjectEvent structureen_US
dc.subjectSlavic linguisticsen_US
dc.subject.classificationSlavic studiesen_US
dc.titleCase and Event Structure in Russian and Lithuanianen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
Appears in Collections:Slavic Languages and Literatures

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Anderson_princeton_0181D_10656.pdf1.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Download

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.