Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gm80hx72t
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWachtel, Michael Aen_US
dc.contributor.authorCeballos, Lindsay Marieen_US
dc.contributor.otherSlavic Languages and Literatures Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-07T20:00:30Z-
dc.date.available2017-09-30T08:05:23Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gm80hx72t-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation makes an argument for the significance of ancient and modern tragedy in the work of Russian (“first-generation”) Symbolist poets and religious thinkers associated with the Russian religious renaissance. Main authors studied are Konstantin Bal'mont, Nikolai Berdiaev, Valerii Briusov, Sergei Bulgakov, Viacheslav Ivanov, Maurice Maeterlinck, Dmitrii Merezhkovskii, and Nikolai Minskii. While interest in tragedy may be traced to the popularity of Nietzsche’s Birth of Tragedy in turn-of-the-century Russia, I argue that poets and thinkers gravitated to “tragic thinking” for not only aesthetic, but predominantly religious reasons. A particular mode of mythopoesis, tragic plots and characters offered narratives for poets and thinkers to examine the modern individual’s spiritual search. This inner search for spiritual transcendence is characterized by a focus on inner struggle (exemplified in modern tragedy), rather than externally imposed threats to the individual hero (ancient tragedy). I claim that this inner spiritual struggle, being connected to the ascetic tradition of Russian religious culture, calls for greater scholarly attention to the Symbolist reception of Nietzsche’s “Apollonian principle.” Chapter One deals with Nikolai Minskii, his philosophy of meonism, the relevance of Russian Symbolist reception of Maeterlinck in the context of Minskii’s changing conception of tragedy, and his modern tragic drama, Al'ma. Chapter Two examines Dmitrii Merezhkovskii’s tragic philosophy of love in the context of his literary work and essays on world literature. His translations of Greek tragedy reflect his formulation of a non-sexual erotic love. Chapter Three is devoted to Valerii Briusov’s dystopian tragedy Zemlia (Earth). Through analysis of previously unknown Mesoamerican and spiritualist subtexts of Zemlia, I read Briusov’s drama as an ironic response to early Symbolist Christian interpretations of tragedy. In the conclusion, I focus on the special case of the Moscow Art Theater’s stage adaptation of Dostoevskii’s Besy (Devils). The religious-philosophical response to this production is presented as the final chapter in the Symbolist reception of tragedy: the “novel-tragedy” and the drawbacks of tragedy as theater.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: http://catalog.princeton.edu/en_US
dc.subjectphilosophyen_US
dc.subjectpoetryen_US
dc.subjectRussian religious thoughten_US
dc.subjectRussian Symbolismen_US
dc.subjecttragedyen_US
dc.subject.classificationSlavic literatureen_US
dc.subject.classificationLiteratureen_US
dc.subject.classificationReligionen_US
dc.titleTRAGIC THINKING IN EARLY RUSSIAN MODERNISM: MINSKII, MEREZHKOVSKII, AND BRIUSOVen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2017-09-30en_US
Appears in Collections:Slavic Languages and Literatures

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Ceballos_princeton_0181D_11457.pdf1.69 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.