Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMassey, Douglas Sen_US
dc.contributor.authorGelatt, Juliaen_US
dc.contributor.otherSociology Departmenten_US
dc.description.abstractImmigration inflows have changed the face of the US child population. Today, almost one-quarter of children in the United States have at least one immigrant parent, and of those, 5.5 million have at least one undocumented immigrant parent. About 1 million children are themselves undocumented immigrants. In this dissertation, I analyze the implications of parents' and children's immigration status for various dimensions of child well-being. I draw mainly on the Los Angeles Family and Neighborhood Survey (L.A. FANS), a survey representative of Los Angeles County, which contains direct measures of respondents' immigration status, but also on the National Health Interview Survey and Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, to explore children's health insurance coverage, access to healthcare, physical health, mental health, and academic performance in Latino families. I find that access to health insurance and a usual healthcare provider are severely constrained for children in undocumented immigrant families, that is, for children who are themselves undocumented, but that such children still get annual checkups at rates similar to other children. Some evidence suggests they may receive less thorough care than children in native families. Evidence on the health status of children of undocumented immigrants is mixed. Looking at children's behavioral problems, as a measure of children's mental health, I find that children in all immigrant families show greater overall and internalizing behavioral problems than children in native families. But children in undocumented immigrant families, who are themselves undocumented, show the greatest mental health problems, particularly through externalizing behaviors. Children in all types of immigrant families, regardless of legal status, tend to show superior cognitive skills on letter word identification tests compared to children in native Latino families, but show similar scores to children in native families on applied math tests and reading comprehension tests. Taken together, my findings suggest that children in Latino, undocumented immigrant families in Los Angeles face particular threats to their healthy growth and development, while children in mixed-status families appear to share experiences more with children in legal immigrant families than with children in undocumented immigrant families.en_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectmental healthen_US
dc.titleImmigration Status and Child Well-Being in the United Statesen_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
Appears in Collections:Sociology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Gelatt_princeton_0181D_10640.pdf1.26 MBAdobe PDFView/Download

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.