Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gb19f889g
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNeilson, Christopher-
dc.contributor.authorArteaga, Felipe-
dc.contributor.authorKapor, Adam J.-
dc.contributor.authorZimmerman, Seth D.-
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-30T19:24:56Z-
dc.date.available2021-06-30T19:24:56Z-
dc.date.issued2021-06-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01gb19f889g-
dc.description.abstractMany school districts with centralized school choice adopt strategyproof assignment mechanisms to relieve applicants of the need to strategize on the basis of beliefs about their own admissions chances. This paper shows that beliefs about admissions chances shape choice outcomes even when the assignment mechanism is strategyproof by influencing the way applicants search for schools, and that \smart matching platforms" that provide live feedback on admissions chances help applicants search more effectively. Motivated by a model in which applicants engage in costly search for schools and over-optimism can lead to under-search, we use data from a large-scale survey of choice participants in Chile to show that learning about schools is hard, that beliefs about admissions chances guide the decision to stop searching, and that applicants systematically underestimate non-placement risk. We then use RCT and RD research designs to evaluate live feedback policies in the Chilean and New Haven choice systems. 22% of applicants submitting applications where risks of non-placement are high respond to warnings by adding schools to their lists, reducing non-placement risk by 58%. These results replicate across settings and over time. Reducing the strategic burden of school choice requires not just strategyproofness inside the centralized system, but also choice supports for the strategic decisions that inevitably remain outside of it.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries650-
dc.titleSmart Matching Platforms and Heterogeneous Beliefs in Centralized School Choiceen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
650.pdf12.62 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.