Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ff365530n
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorWhiting, Sarahen_US
dc.contributor.authorStevens, Sara Kathrynen_US
dc.contributor.otherArchitecture Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-11-15T23:56:54Z-
dc.date.available2012-11-15T23:56:54Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01ff365530n-
dc.description.abstractOver the course of the twentieth century, how were real estate developers and architects involved in transforming their own professional practices and the built form of American cities? My dissertation uses historical, architectural, and urban analysis to show how real estate developers and architects in mid-twentieth century America shaped cities as well as housing and urban policy, encouraging suburban-style growth at the edges and centers of American cities. During the first half of the twentieth century, American architects and real estate developers deployed a new kind of expertise that resulted in a qualitatively different set of professional practices and forms of urban expansion. As urban land development shifted in scale, from streetcar suburbs of a few blocks to Levittown-like subdivisions covering thousands of acres, real estate developers gained new knowledge about where and how to attain economies of scale and financial stability. The experiments these developers oversaw in greenfield development--untouched by municipal restrictions, tangential to existing urban fabric--offered new methods for creating profitable, repeatable developments. The legal, administrative, and aesthetic techniques invented for greenfield development influenced policy as developers advised policy makers through their professional organizations. In the postwar years, real estate developers found new advantages in applying greenfield rules to downtown sites. Urban renewal legislation further encouraged large land-clearing projects in urban locations across the country. The increased expertise resulted in more highly controlled and homogenized landscapes while nevertheless opening the door to a new scale of intensity in development. This dissertation studies these changes through three developers from three cities--J.C. Nichols in Kansas City, Herbert Greenwald in Chicago, and William Zeckendorf in New York. Biographical analysis connects the expertise of these individuals to the larger historical trends in their profession. Two thematic studies--one on professionalization that studies the Urban Land Institute and another on finance and the life insurance industry's funding of urban renewal projects--build the larger narrative about how expertise and finance operated in real estate and architecture. The connection this project will make between architecture and real estate development will inform how expertise turns a tract of land into profit.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectarchitectureen_US
dc.subjectreal estateen_US
dc.subjectreal estate developmenten_US
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_US
dc.subjecturban policyen_US
dc.subjecturban renewalen_US
dc.subject.classificationArchitectureen_US
dc.subject.classificationAmerican historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationUrban planningen_US
dc.titleDeveloping Expertise: The Architecture of Real Estate, 1908-1965en_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
Appears in Collections:Architecture

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Stevens_princeton_0181D_10292.pdf28.76 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.