Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01cr56n0997
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorTurney, Kristinen_US
dc.contributor.authorClampet-Lundquist, Susanen_US
dc.contributor.authorEdin, Kathrynen_US
dc.contributor.authorKling, Jeffreyen_US
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Gregen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:57:07Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:57:07Z-
dc.date.issued2006-03-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01cr56n0997-
dc.description.abstractThe Moving To Opportunity randomized housing voucher demonstration finds virtually no significant effects on employment or earnings of adults. Using qualitative data from in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 67 participants in Baltimore, we find that although the voucher and control groups have similar rates of employment and earnings, respondents’ relationship to the labor market does differ by program group. Our analysis suggests that the voucher group did not experience employment or earnings gains in part because of human capital barriers that existed prior to moving to a low-poverty neighborhood. In addition, employed respondents in all groups were heavily concentrated in retail and health care jobs. To secure or maintain employment, they relied heavily on a particular job search strategy – informal referrals from similarly skilled and credentialed acquaintances who already held jobs in these sectors. Though experimentals were more likely to have employed neighbors, few of their neighbors held jobs in these sectors and could not provide such referrals. Thus controls had an easier time garnering such referrals. Additionally, the configuration of the metropolitan area’s public transportation routes in relationship to the locations of hospitals, nursing homes, and malls posed additional transportation challenges to experimentals as they searched for employment – challenges controls were less likely to face.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 511en_US
dc.subjectneighborhood effects; social experiment; mixed methodsen_US
dc.titleNeighborhood Effects on Barriers to Employment: Results From a Randomized Housing Mobility Experiment in Baltimoreen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat