Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019s161619j
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDAN-COHEN, Taliaen_US
dc.contributor.otherAnthropology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-29T18:04:48Z-
dc.date.available2015-12-09T07:42:42Z-
dc.date.issued2012en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp019s161619j-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation, based on roughly eighteen months of fieldwork in two laboratories at Princeton University, examines how practitioners of synthetic biology orient themselves vis-à-vis organic systems, by both engaging with and displacing biological knowledge. It also explores experimental methods in a highly uncertain field. Synthetic biology is a new field of study in which practitioners are attempting to build novel organic systems from materials in the lab, drawing on knowledge and practices from engineering as well as biology and chemistry. Many synthetic biologists share the long-range aim of designing organic systems that will perform predictable functions. They seek to use cells for technological ends: a material among other materials. The newness of synthetic biology, I argue, has methodological value for anthropology in that it transposes difference--a hallmark of classical anthropological knowledge production--to the register of time. Novelty is a tool for generating difference and discontinuity, a tool that allows scientists and engineers, but also anthropologists, to unsettle entrenched understandings. There are two major themes that emerge from my research. The first theme has to do with the denaturalization of biological knowledge. I examine the transformations and mythical alterations by means of which synthetic biologists question deeply held beliefs about living beings. The second theme involves the ability to take a conceptual framework or hypothesis and use it to produce results in the lab. The dissertation thus addresses such questions as: How are concepts reinforced and embedded in the research process? How do researchers conceive of their projects and their findings in such a way that the results of their work fit into the broader world in which it is set? And how do their projects and the answers they generate build on or displace other ways of approaching living beings?en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> library's main catalog </a>en_US
dc.subjectEmergenceen_US
dc.subjectEngineeringen_US
dc.subjectKnowledgeen_US
dc.subjectNoveltyen_US
dc.subjectPracticeen_US
dc.subjectSynthetic Biologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationCultural anthropologyen_US
dc.subject.classificationScandinavian studiesen_US
dc.titleMaking Life is Easy: Novelty and Uncertainty in Synthetic Biologyen_US