Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Slow Tampering: A History of Solitary Confinement
Authors: Weinreich, Spencer Jacob
Advisors: GraftonKunzel, AnthonyRegina T
Contributors: History of Science Department
Keywords: isolation
solitary confinement
Subjects: History
Religious history
Issue Date: 2022
Publisher: Princeton, NJ : Princeton University
Abstract: “Slow Tampering” chronicles the history of solitary confinement from the medieval inquisitor who first experimented with its potential to the collapse of the nineteenth-century penitentiary movement, which had vested such hopes in solitude as an instrument of reformation. It is the history of a perverse optimism—the conviction, inherited from Christian theology, that souls can change and be changed, by force if necessary—and of a faith in solitude as the catalyst of coerced redemption. The prison cell is the weaponization of the monastic cell, the space of penitential rebirth, whose ambitions have colored the subsequent history of punishment. “Slow Tampering” asks how violence can be an expression of religious conviction and a tool of knowledge-making, and how pious intentions inspire unspeakable cruelty. The dissertation analyzes solitary confinement as a kind of experiment, existing in the tension between projects of reform and the work of punishment. Precisely because the practice is forever reinventing itself, solitary confinement has survived and thrived across millennia, a staying power that can be investigated only with an equally broad historical perspective. The dissertation finds solitary confinement in medieval dungeons and Baroque reformatories, in penitentiaries and plantations, across four continents, a ubiquitous form of violence within carcerality. “Slow Tampering,” in offering such a panorama, argues for attending to continuity rather than rupture in the history of the prison, as well as countering the modernist, secular slants of carceral studies. The project establishes the sophistication and power of premodern carceral regimes, whose ideologies and practices decisively shaped modern penal structures. The dissertation is itself a kind of experiment, grappling with the historiographical challenge of historicizing human experience, particularly so extreme an experience as solitary confinement. The project rests on the epistemic authority of survivors, who possess insights into the nature of solitary confinement unattainable by the historian.
Type of Material: Academic dissertations (Ph.D.)
Language: en
Appears in Collections:History of Science

Files in This Item:
This content is embargoed until 2024-11-22. For questions about theses and dissertations, please contact the Mudd Manuscript Library. For questions about research datasets, as well as other inquiries, please contact the DataSpace curators.

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.