Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp016395w709f
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLevine, Phillipen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:31:06Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:31:06Z-
dc.date.issued1990-10-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp016395w709f-
dc.description.abstractThis paper documents and attempts to explain the observed disparities between unemployment rates computed from contemporaneous and retrospective CPS data. The maintained hypothesis is that the discrepancies are consistent with different definitions of unemployment between the two measures. The longitudinal nature of the CPS, which allows a respondent's answers to be matched between one year and the next, is exploited to examine two commonly expressed shortcomings in the contemporaneous definition. I find that relative to the retrospective measure, more workers with weak labor force attachment are considered unemployed in the contemporaneous rate. In addition, discouraged workers, who are classified as out of the labor force according to the contemporaneous definition, may be counted as unemployed in the retrospective.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 276en_US
dc.subjectunemployment ratesen_US
dc.subjectmeasurement erroren_US
dc.subjectcurrent population surveyen_US
dc.titleContemporaneous vs. Retrospective Unemployment: Through the Filter of Memory or the Muddle of the Current Population Survey?en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat