Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014t64gn17s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorManning, Alanen_US
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-26T01:44:35Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-26T01:44:35Z-
dc.date.issued2008-12-01T00:00:00Zen_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp014t64gn17s-
dc.description.abstractThis paper shows, using data from both the US and the UK, that average plant size is larger in denser markets. However, many popular theories of agglomeration – spillovers, cost advantages and improved match quality – predict that establishments should be smaller in cities. The paper proposes a theory based on monopsony in labour markets that can explain the stylized fact – that firms in all labour markets have some market power but that they have less market power in cities. It also presents evidence that the labour supply curve to individual firms is more elastic in larger markets.en_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesWorking Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 539en_US
dc.subjectAgglomerationen_US
dc.subjectLabour marketsen_US
dc.subjectMonopsonyen_US
dc.titleThe Plant Size-Place Effect: Agglomeration and Monopsony in Labour Marketsen_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
539.pdf2.68 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.