Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012801pk41d
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorTannous, Jack
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, Skyler
dc.contributor.otherHistory Department
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-16T10:13:28Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012801pk41d-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation is an attempt to understand the ways Muslim scholars in the 2nd/8th-8th/14th centuries renegotiated their relationship with the traditions they associated with the People of the Book. In Chapter One I map out a discourse on “Jewish and Christian” knowledge via the term isrāʾīliyyāt. I make the case that the discourse surrounding isrāʾīliyyāt was also an extension of an earlier discourse over traditions of the Children of Israel. I argue that these connected discourses served to differentiate Jewish and Christian knowledge, impacting the transmission and reception of this information by Muslim scholars. In Chapter Two I follow this thread into the world of legal theory. I use a debate over the question of sharīʿat man qablanā, “the law of those before us,” in treatises on legal theory to illuminate attitudes towards the use of Jewish and Christian knowledge in the formation and interpretation of Islamic law. Chapter Three addresses the use of isrāʾīliyyāt in Qurʾānic exegesis through a study of a narrative concerning the first pregnancy of Eve. I show how a patently Islamic story came to be labeled isrāʾīliyyāt, resulting in its rejection within certain traditions of Qurʾān commentary. Chapter Four examines how Muslim scholars navigated three sources of tension on the necessity of miracles as a proof of prophethood: the Qurʾān, biographical traditions of Muḥammad, and Christian polemics. Through reasserting the Qurʾān’s preeminence as the miracle of miracles, I argue that Muslim apologists were able to redefine the debate over proofs of prophethood in a uniquely Islamic fashion. Based on these case studies, I suggest that we can use Muslim scholars’ challenging of Jewish and Christian traditions as a lens to better understand the conceptualization of a distinct Islamic tradition in the 2nd/8th-8th/14th centuries.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton University
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: <a href=http://catalog.princeton.edu> catalog.princeton.edu </a>
dc.subjectIslamic tradition
dc.subjectisrāʾīliyyāt
dc.subjectIsrāʾīliyyāt
dc.subjectPeople of the Book
dc.subject.classificationHistory
dc.subject.classificationIslamic studies
dc.subject.classificationReligion
dc.titleCHALLENGING RECEIVED WISDOM: THE PEOPLE OF THE BOOK AND THE CREATION OF AN ISLAMIC TRADITION
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)
pu.embargo.lift2023-02-22-
pu.embargo.terms2023-02-22
Appears in Collections:History

Files in This Item:
This content is embargoed until 2023-02-22. For more information contact the Mudd Manuscript Library.


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.