Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Anchoring Damage Awards of Mock-Jurors and Forewarning to Reduce Anchoring Effects
Authors: Sanford, Broden
Advisors: Cooper, Joel
Contributors: Todorov, Alex
Department: Psychology
Class Year: 2013
Abstract: Anchoring effects have been demonstrated in legal proceedings, while the literature has yet to demonstrate clearly whether or not Forewarning might be an available intervention against Anchoring effects. 388 participants who responded to an online survey were used to test the hypothesis that a Forewarning, delivered through a judge’s instructions, would reduce Anchoring effects in the damage awards of mock jurors. Although no statistically significant overall Forewarning by Anchoring effect was found, Forewarning was shown to create a significant difference between the Anchoring conditions once introduced. From what was found in the literature this is the first demonstration of Forewarning influencing Anchoring in a courtroom setting. The results suggest changes in current plaintiff award request strategy and that Forewarning may be a possible intervention in the courtroom.
Extent: 77 pages
Access Restrictions: Walk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the Mudd Manuscript Library.
Type of Material: Princeton University Senior Theses
Language: en_US
Appears in Collections:Psychology, 1930-2016

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Thesis.FINAL -Sanford B..pdf1.6 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.