Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01xs55mf52s
Title: Responsibility, Excusing Conditions, and Neuroscience Two Essays:How Responsibility is Preserved in a Mechanistic World Through Perceived Freedom and Current Neuroscience Cannot Be the Primary Method to Determine an Excusing Condition, and It Will Be Difficult to Do So in the Future
Authors: Jian, George
Advisors: Elga, Adam
Contributors: Kelly, Thomas
Department: Philosophy
Class Year: 2016
Abstract: If external physical causes determine our actions, it seems we cannot be free and morally responsible. I argue we can be free and responsible because we have perceived freedom, barring the presence of certain conditions that excuse from legal responsibility. In addition, I argue that neuroscience cannot be the primary way to determine if one has these excusing conditions, because excusing conditions are behaviorally defined.
Extent: 46 pages
URI: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01xs55mf52s
Type of Material: Princeton University Senior Theses
Language: en_US
Appears in Collections:Philosophy, 1924-2016

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Jian_Thesis.pdf305.79 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.