Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

`http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01x346d4172`

Title: | A Useful Interpretation of R-Squared in Binary Choice Models (Or, Have We Dismissed the Good Old R-Squared; Prematurely) |

Authors: | Gronau, Reuben |

Keywords: | binary variable qualitative choice arithmetic mean |

Issue Date: | 1-Feb-1998 |

Series/Report no.: | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 397 |

Abstract: | The discreditation of the Linear Probability Model (LPM) has led to the dismissal of the standard \(R^{2}\) as a measure of goodness-of-ﬁt in binary choice models. It is argued that as a descriptive tool the standard \(R^{2}\) is still superior to the measures currently in use. In the LPM model \(R^{2}\) has a simple interpretation: it equals the difference between the average predicted probability in the two groups. It also measures the fraction of the explained part of the variance (SSR) due to the difference between the conditional means (SSB). Given \(R^{2}\) and the sample proportion \(P\) one can calculate the conditional means, \(\bar{P}_{0}\) and \(\bar{P}_{1}\). This interpretation still holds for non-linear cases when \(R\) is computed as the regression coefﬁcient of the predicted value on the dependent binary variable: However, even if other deﬁnitions of \(R^{2}\) are used in this case (e. g., the share of the variance explained by the regression, or the correlation coefficient between true and predicted values), the measure is very close to \(\bar{P}_{1} - \bar{P}_{0}\). |

URI: | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01x346d4172 |

Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers |

Files in This Item:

File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|

397.pdf | 634.15 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.