Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01sb397834g
Title: Three Angry Men: A Game Theoretic Analysis of How The Two-Sided Unanimous Verdict Rule Affects Outcomes in Jury Trials
Authors: Harrel, William
Advisors: Adam Meirowitz
Contributors: van Handel, Ramon
Department: Operations Research and Financial Engineering
Class Year: 2013
Abstract: Much has been written about how deliberative bodies such as juries come to decisions with imperfect information, but most of this research assumes either majority rule, one-sided unanimity, or another binary decision rule. We analyze what happens when juries are required to abide by a two-sided unanimous verdict rule in which unanimity is required to convict or acquit a defendant, and if there is no unanimous verdict after a certain number of rounds of voting, there is a mistrial. We nd that two-sided unanimity performs at least as well as simple majority and one-sided unanimity, and it usually performs better.
Extent: 70 pages
URI: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01sb397834g
Access Restrictions: Walk-in Access. This thesis can only be viewed on computer terminals at the Mudd Manuscript Library.
Type of Material: Princeton University Senior Theses
Language: en_US
Appears in Collections:Operations Research and Financial Engineering, 2000-2016

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Harrel Will Final Thesis.pdf16.57 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.