|
DataSpace at Princeton University >
Industrial Relations Section >
Working Papers >
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01jd472w450
|
| Title: | The Government As Litigant: Further Tests of the Case Selection Model |
| Contributors: | Farber, Henry S. Eisenberg, Theodore |
| Keywords: | case selection litigation trials |
| Issue Date: | 1-Jul-1999 |
| Series/Report no.: | 418 |
| Abstract: | We develop a model of the plaintiff’s decision to file a law suit that has
implications for how differences between the federal government and private litigants and
litigation translate into differences in trial rates and plaintiff win rates at trial. Our case
selection model generates a set of predictions for relative trial rates and plaintiff win rates
depending on the type of case and whether the government is defendant or plaintiff. In
order to test the model, we use data on about 350,000 cases filed in federal district court
between 1979 and 1997 in the areas of personal injury and job discrimination where the
federal government and private parties work under roughly similar legal rules. We find
broad support for the predictions of the model. |
| URI: | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01jd472w450 |
| Appears in Collections: | Working Papers
|
Items in DataSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
|