Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
|Title:||Cost, Benefits and Distributional Consequences of Inmate Labor|
|Authors:||Krueger, Alan B.|
Kling, Jeffrey R.
|Keywords:||criminal offender; employment; recidivism|
|Citation:||Reprinted in IRRA 53rd. Annual Proceedings, January 2001.|
|Series/Report no.:||Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 449|
|Abstract:||We estimate that permitting inmate labor would likely increase national output, but by less than 0.2 percent of Gross Domestic Product. The largest social benefits from inmate labor are likely to come about from decreased recidivism, although the effect of inmate labor on subsequent crime and recidivism rates has not been adequately studied. The potential inmate workforce is low skilled. We estimate that permitting inmate labor could reduce wages of high school dropouts in the private workforce by 5 percent. To improve the economic contribution of inmate labor, we propose that private ﬁrms be allowed to bid for inmate labor, and that inmate workers be subject to all relevant labor legislation, including the right to collective representation. Alternative strategies for reducing recidivism and integrating offenders into mainstream society upon release, such as education and training, should also be considered, perhaps in conjunction with inmate labor.|
|Appears in Collections:||IRS Working Papers|
Files in This Item:
|449.pdf||36.41 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Download|
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.