Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01cj82k974k
Title: Democracy and Legalization: Evidence from Preferential Trade Agreements 1950 - 2009
Authors: Kang, Dae Woong
Advisors: Davis, Christina
Department: Woodrow Wilson School
Class Year: 2016
Abstract: Dispute settlement in PTAs can range from diplomatic means of negotiation or a highly institutionalized standing court. I ask, what factors influence states to delegate their sovereignty to international judicial bodies? This paper seeks to determine a causal link between democracy and state preference for legalization in preferential trade agreements (PTAs). More specifically, I examine the effect of regime transition on a state’s preference for legalized forms of dispute settlement in PTAs. Scholars in dispute settlement design have previously emphasized the role of legal dispute settlement as a means for states to make credible commitments in conditions of uncertainty. New democracies are noted for being perceived by international actors as uncertain – there is the danger that these democracies will again slide to autocracy. In this paper, I present another argument: that democratic states sign legalized preferential trade agreements because it aligns with domestic norms and values. Thus, states sign more agreements with legal dispute settlement as they consolidate democracy and democratic norms. I test these two viewpoints empirically using a comprehensive dataset of signing patterns of PTAs for 176 countries from 1950 – 2009. I use a monadic state analysis to determine how the “average” state in the international system changes its preferences on legalization as it transitions from autocracy to democracy. My empirical findings support the theory that a state will sign more legalized agreements as they increase in democratic norms. I also add a comparative case study on Jordan and Uruguay to compare two economically similar countries with differing political systems. In addition, I critically examine how each country’s preference for legalized preferential trade agreement varies across time.
Extent: 98 pages
URI: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01cj82k974k
Type of Material: Princeton University Senior Theses
Language: en_US
Appears in Collections:Woodrow Wilson School, 1929-2016

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Kang_Dae.pdf1.34 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.