Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
Title: Econometric Methods in Staples
Authors: Ashmore, David
Hosken, Daniel
Baker, Jonathan
Ashenfelter, Orley
Gleason, Suzanne
Keywords: statistical models
cross-sectional estimates
fixed effect estimates
panel data
Issue Date: 1-May-2004
Series/Report no.: Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 486
Abstract: Econometrics played a major role in the investigation and litigation of the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) successful challenge to the proposed merger between two office superstore chains, Staples and Office Depot. Our goal in writing this essay is to describe the econometric issues at stake in evaluating the FTC’s central claim that the price charged by office supply superstores was related to the number and identity of superstore firms participating in the market. Similar statistical models were relied upon by the FTC and the merging firms to analyze pricing. Our discussion of these models highlights the advantages and disadvantages of alternative approaches to analyzing a panel data set: cross-sectional estimates versus fixed effects estimates. We also describe and evaluate modeling choices that appeared to have substantial influence on the empirical results.
Appears in Collections:IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
486.pdf197.93 kBAdobe PDFView/Download

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.