Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp016395w709f
 Title: Contemporaneous vs. Retrospective Unemployment: Through the Filter of Memory or the Muddle of the Current Population Survey? Authors: Levine, Phillip Keywords: unemployment ratesmeasurement errorcurrent population survey Issue Date: 1-Oct-1990 Series/Report no.: Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 276 Abstract: This paper documents and attempts to explain the observed disparities between unemployment rates computed from contemporaneous and retrospective CPS data. The maintained hypothesis is that the discrepancies are consistent with different definitions of unemployment between the two measures. The longitudinal nature of the CPS, which allows a respondent's answers to be matched between one year and the next, is exploited to examine two commonly expressed shortcomings in the contemporaneous definition. I find that relative to the retrospective measure, more workers with weak labor force attachment are considered unemployed in the contemporaneous rate. In addition, discouraged workers, who are classified as out of the labor force according to the contemporaneous definition, may be counted as unemployed in the retrospective. URI: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp016395w709f Appears in Collections: IRS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat
276.pdf2.82 MBAdobe PDF

Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.