Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013x816q06m
Title: REEVALUATING STUDENT OUTCOMES AT FOR-PROFIT COLLEGES IN THE UNITED STATES: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS WITHOUT AND WITH STUDENT CONTROLS
Authors: Huie, Christopher
Advisors: Neilson, Christopher
Department: Economics
Class Year: 2016
Abstract: For-profit colleges (“for-profits”) in the United States are higher education institutions that are operated by profit-seeking corporations. They have been criticized for their high costs, poor student outcomes, and unethical business practices, but also have been lauded for effectively preparing nontraditional, underprivileged students for the labor market. With new data from College Scorecard, this study evaluates how five student outcomes— mean income, completion, retention, repayment, and cohort default rate—differ between for-profits and non-profits without and with student controls. This study also presents and analyzes the distributions of school fixed effects on each of these outcomes by type of institution without and with student controls, with a focus on the difference between forprofits and non-profits. These analyses show mixed results: with student controls, forprofits do not improve in mean income and cohort default rate, but they do relatively improve with completion, retention, and repayments rates, though they are still the worst performing for retention rates relative to non-profits. Some of this evidence is substantiated by a robustness check with a different set of controls, but another robustness check suggests that the sample this study uses is biased. These results may be suggestive of policy in light of an ongoing debate of the regulation of for-profits.
Extent: 95 pages
URI: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013x816q06m
Type of Material: Princeton University Senior Theses
Language: en_US
Appears in Collections:Economics, 1927-2016

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Economics_Senior_Thesis_Submission_Click_Here_To_Submit_cchuie_attempt_2016-04-13-15-14-00_Thesis_Draft_vF.pdf2.05 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.