Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vm40xv036
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorComan, Alin-
dc.contributor.authorGomez, Olivia-
dc.date.accessioned2016-07-15T12:46:31Z-
dc.date.available2016-07-15T12:46:31Z-
dc.date.created2016-04-05-
dc.date.issued2016-07-15-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01vm40xv036-
dc.description.abstractWith the justice system constantly under the microscope of public opinion, the flawed nature of jury deliberations is an issue that has come to the foreground of thought in this day and age. While courts across the country put a significant emphasis relying on memories, especially with the jurors, emerging literature in the psychological field suggests that human memory is faulty in a way that could be detrimental to the search for justice in a trial by jury. This paper explores the effect on memory that jury deliberations have, and how policy can use note-taking to combat some of the negative effects that come along with the inherent flawed nature of relying simply on memories in jury deliberation.en_US
dc.format.extent57 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.title“Can I Have My Notes Back?” Note-Taking and the Effects of Retrieval-Induced Forgetting on Jury Deliberationsen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2016en_US
pu.departmentWoodrow Wilson Schoolen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Princeton School of Public and International Affairs, 1929-2023

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Gomez_Olivia.pdf287.91 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.