Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01fn1071301
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorCheridito, Patrick-
dc.contributor.authorZhao, David-
dc.date.accessioned2015-07-29T16:51:58Z-
dc.date.available2015-07-29T16:51:58Z-
dc.date.created2015-04-13-
dc.date.issued2015-07-29-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp01fn1071301-
dc.description.abstractBecause of its rapid rise and increasing popularity, Bitcoin commands more than just a diehard regiment of believers. With interest from multiple parties across a variety of fields, the cryptocurrency would benefit from a clearer classification of its status as an asset. We focus on currencies and commodities as viable standards of comparison and use a plethora of metrics to characterize Bitcoin. Such techniques include, but are not limited to, GARCH(1, 1) models and Garman-Kolhagen-based option pricing models. Due to the idiosyncrasies of Bitcoin, we have to make some assumptions about interest rate and liquidity. Following, we find that Bitcoin seems to behave like a currency with respect to fit of a GARCH(1, 1) model based on the Ljung-Box test on residuals and appears to behave like a commodity in terms of price variance.en_US
dc.format.extent118 pages*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.titleBITCOIN: CURRENCY OR COMMODITY A Look into Classifying Everybody’s Favorite Cryptocurrencyen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2015en_US
pu.departmentOperations Research and Financial Engineeringen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
Appears in Collections:Operations Research and Financial Engineering, 2000-2023

Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PUTheses2015-Zhao_David.pdf2.03 MBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.