Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp018k71nm41b
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorReynoldsElyachar, MichaelJulia
dc.contributor.authorPelling, Jamie Heather-
dc.contributor.otherNear Eastern Studies Department
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-21T17:08:33Z-
dc.date.created2023-01-01
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp018k71nm41b-
dc.description.abstract“Feeling Like a State: Anxiety and Optimism in the late-Ottoman Empire” follows the collective optimism, shared hopes, and common aspirations that gave shape to the late-Ottoman public and bound it to the state. I explore the rise of this optimism against the backdrop of a system of international law that consistently undermined the sovereignty of the Ottoman Empire, provoking anxieties among Ottoman statesmen and intellectuals as they sought international recognition and validation. I argue that this interplay between optimism and anxiety was a defining feature of late-Ottoman politics, underpinning nation-building projects and religious reforms, changing gendered expectations and shifting the rules of moral behaviour. I trace the hope for an Ottoman future and the fears of its dissolution through the flux of late-Ottoman history. My research fills a gap in existing literature, the hitherto un-studied thread of public feeling, and places it at the centre of this history. In this approach, I evade the teleological traps associated with the birth of an explicitly modernising, nationalist republic. The collective hopes and fears clustered around the state in this period are tied to some of the biggest questions of the twentieth century: colonialism, modernity, nationalism, and state legitimacy. The Ottoman Empire, as a semi-colonial, semi-colonised state, pursuing modernity and fraught with competing national visions, is well-placed to trouble narratives which seek to pull these four themes into a single stream. In my dissertation, I focus on the collective feeling emerging from the tensions between these themes. I address questions such as how it is that states become affectively charged, how they become the repository for the optimisms and anxieties of individuals, and how this changes our understanding of what a state is. States are abstractions and yet they have the power to kill, to make life, to punish, and to shape human behaviour, if not our consciousness. Do they also have the ability to feel?en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.subjectAffect Theoryen_US
dc.subjectAnxietyen_US
dc.subjectFeelingen_US
dc.subjectNon-Sovereigntyen_US
dc.subjectOptimismen_US
dc.subjectOttoman Empireen_US
dc.subject.classificationMiddle Eastern studies
dc.subject.classificationHistory
dc.subject.classificationSexuality
dc.titleFeeling Like a State: Anxiety and Optimism in the late-Ottoman Empireen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
pu.embargo.lift2025-09-28-
pu.embargo.terms2025-09-28
pu.date.classyear2023
pu.departmentNear Eastern Studies
Appears in Collections:Near Eastern Studies

Files in This Item:
This content is embargoed until 2025-09-28. For questions about theses and dissertations, please contact the Mudd Manuscript Library. For questions about research datasets, as well as other inquiries, please contact the DataSpace curators.


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.