Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp017w62fb617
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorda Costa Meyer, Estheren_US
dc.contributor.authorDemerdash, Nancy N.A.en_US
dc.contributor.otherArt and Archaeology Departmenten_US
dc.date.accessioned2015-12-08T15:21:33Z-
dc.date.available2019-11-24T10:13:54Z-
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp017w62fb617-
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation investigates the dialectical discourses of modernism and the vernacular in Tunisian architectural and urban projects, from the late French protectorate into the period of independence, 1940-1970. With a particular focus on issues of habitation and heritage, this project tracks the reorganization of social space in the reconstruction efforts of the postwar French colonial administration and the architectural and patrimonial discourses of the Tunisian nation-state that came into existence in 1956. In an era that witnessed mass-scale land expropriations, rural-urban migrations, and popular anti-colonial sentiment, this project traces the material effects of Tunisians’ displacements and urban adaptations to their rapidly changing socio-political condition. Underscoring the dialectics intrinsic to the postwar notion of development, namely, tensions between formal and informal settlements, vernacular building traditions and prefabrication methods, and patrimonial preservation and erasure, this dissertation explores the ideological negotiations of architectural progress in the longue durée of decolonization. Throughout this tumultuous period, social housing projects sprouted in parallel with the spread of gourbivilles (earthen dwellings) and bidonvilles (‘tin can’ towns) on the outskirts of Tunisia’s urban centers. Both colonial and postcolonial institutional and state-led reckonings with vernacular architecture forwarded not only modernist building agendas, but promoted primitivizing mythologies of local construction techniques, rooted in racist attitudes towards the purportedly backward indigène. Challenging the predominant historiographical narrative that presents the independence of 1956 as a stark political rupture, this dissertation instead demonstrates that the vestiges of urban and preservationist policy schemes remained ingrained, on an institutional level, from protectorate rule. How the spatial and political processes of decolonization, nation-building, and development intersect with the ethics and economics of habitation undergirds this project.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherPrinceton, NJ : Princeton Universityen_US
dc.relation.isformatofThe Mudd Manuscript Library retains one bound copy of each dissertation. Search for these copies in the library's main catalog: http://catalog.princeton.edu/en_US
dc.subjectarchitectureen_US
dc.subjectdecolonizationen_US
dc.subjectdevelopmenten_US
dc.subjectreconstructionen_US
dc.subjectTunisiaen_US
dc.subjecturbanismen_US
dc.subject.classificationArt historyen_US
dc.subject.classificationArchitectureen_US
dc.subject.classificationMiddle Eastern studiesen_US
dc.titleTunisia, 1940-1970: The Spatial Politics of Reconstruction, Decolonization, and Developmenten_US
dc.typeAcademic dissertations (Ph.D.)en_US
pu.projectgrantnumber690-2143en_US
pu.embargo.terms2019-11-24en_US
Appears in Collections:Art and Archaeology

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Demerdash_princeton_0181D_11574.pdf1.43 MBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.