Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp017p88ck35c
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorFriedberg, Aaron-
dc.contributor.authorMorean, Michael-
dc.date.accessioned2019-06-25T17:50:13Z-
dc.date.available2019-06-25T17:50:13Z-
dc.date.created2019-04-02-
dc.date.issued2019-06-25-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp017p88ck35c-
dc.description.abstractThis thesis attempts to understand why President Obama chose to intervene in the humanitarian conflict of Libya and not Syria. In order to examine the foreign policy decision making of President Obama, this research analyzes the influence of five domestic and international variables which could have influenced President Obama's decision in the two cases. Through comparative analysis, this research attempts to provide a comprehensive explanation for why President Obama chose to intervene in one case and not the other and provide a better understanding for the President's foreign policy decision making more generally.en_US
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf-
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.titleThe Politics of Intervention: An Understanding of President Obama's Foreign Policy Decision Making in Libya and Syriaen_US
dc.typePrinceton University Senior Theses-
pu.date.classyear2019en_US
pu.departmentPoliticsen_US
pu.pdf.coverpageSeniorThesisCoverPage-
pu.contributor.authorid961167319-
Appears in Collections:Politics, 1927-2023

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MOREAN-MICHAEL-THESIS.pdf532.7 kBAdobe PDF    Request a copy


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.