Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012r36tx54cFull metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Olson, Craig A. | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2011-10-26T01:45:15Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2011-10-26T01:45:15Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 1992-01-01T00:00:00Z | en_US |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp012r36tx54c | - |
| dc.description.abstract | Most research on arbitrator decision-making has used a model that assumes there is only one disputed issue. This study shows this model is not appropriate in multi—issue disputes under a final—offer by package law. Using data from Wisconsin, I find arbitrators do give substantial weight to non-wage issues in multi-issue disputes. However, the written awards of arbitrators substantially understate the weight given to non-wage issues in the final offer selection. | en_US |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | Working Papers (Princeton University. Industrial Relations Section) ; 296 | en_US |
| dc.subject | arbitration | en_US |
| dc.subject | arbitration decision-making | en_US |
| dc.subject | dispute settlement | en_US |
| dc.title | Arbitrator Decision-Making in Multi-Issue Disputes | en_US |
| dc.type | Working Paper | en_US |
| pu.projectgrantnumber | 360-2050 | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | IRS Working Papers | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 296.pdf | 838.55 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Download |
Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.