Skip navigation
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013t945q80s
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorClark, Melissa-
dc.contributor.authorRothstein, Jesse-
dc.contributor.authorWhitmore Schanzenbach, Diane-
dc.date.accessioned2012-07-24T20:06:16Z-
dc.date.available2012-07-24T20:06:16Z-
dc.date.issued2007-01-
dc.identifier.urihttp://arks.princeton.edu/ark:/88435/dsp013t945q80s-
dc.description.abstractData from the two leading college admissions tests—the SAT and the ACT—can provide a valuable measures of student achievement, but bias due to the non-representativeness of test takers is an important concern. We take advantage of a policy reform in Illinois that made the ACT a graduation requirement to identify the within- and across-school selectivity of ACTtakers. In contrast to cross-sectional or time-differenced estimates, estimates based on the Illinois policy change indicate substantial positive selection into test participation both across and within schools. Despite this, school-level averages of observed scores are extremely highly correlated with average latent scores, as noise introduced by across-school variation in sample selectivity is small relative to the underlying signal. As a result, in most contexts the use of observed school mean test scores in place of latent means understates the degree of betweenschool variation in average achievement but is otherwise unlikely to lead to misleading conclusions.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseries19-
dc.title"Selection Bias in College Admissions Test Scores"en_US
dc.typeWorking Paperen_US
pu.projectgrantnumber360-2050en_US
Appears in Collections:ERS Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
19ers.pdf784.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Download


Items in Dataspace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.